|
Vector Biolabs
control scrambled shrna ad gfp u6 shrna rad shscr Control Scrambled Shrna Ad Gfp U6 Shrna Rad Shscr, supplied by Vector Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/Ad-GFP-U6-shRNA/10__1096_slash_fj__202500419r-46-34-44 Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control scrambled shrna ad gfp u6 shrna rad shscr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
OriGene
nc gfp ![]() Nc Gfp, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/Scrambled+shRNA+control+in+pGFP-V-RS+shRNA+Vector/pmc13149629-557-62-63 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nc gfp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
control gfp shrna ![]() Control Gfp Shrna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/copGFP+Control+Lentiviral+Particles/10__3390_slash_biom16020240-87-12-16 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control gfp shrna - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bioneer Corporation
control green fluorescence protein gfp sirna ![]() Control Green Fluorescence Protein Gfp Sirna, supplied by Bioneer Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/sequences+sirna/pmc12786997-177-14-8 Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control green fluorescence protein gfp sirna - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
plko 1 control shrna vector targeting gfp ![]() Plko 1 Control Shrna Vector Targeting Gfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/pLKO%2E1+GFP+shRNA+(Plasmid+%2330323)/pmc12482338__10020_2025_1353_MOESM4_ESM-35-22-34 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plko 1 control shrna vector targeting gfp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Vector Biolabs
scramble control shrna ![]() Scramble Control Shrna, supplied by Vector Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/AAV9-GFP-U6-shRNA/pmc12482393-47-24-30 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scramble control shrna - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
control sirna targeting gfp ![]() Control Sirna Targeting Gfp, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/GFP+siRNA/pmc12207436__pnas%2E2425015122%2Esapp-168-6-14 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control sirna targeting gfp - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Addgene inc
plko 1 shgfp control ![]() Plko 1 Shgfp Control, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+control+shrna/pLKO%2E1+GFP+shRNA+(Plasmid+%2330323)/pmc12287318-284-7-9 Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plko 1 shgfp control - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Intellectual disability-causing mutations in KIF11 impair microtubule dynamics and dendritic arborization
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70522-z
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Experimental timeline. B Left: Maximum projection intensity images of an axon from cells co-expressing NC-GFP (scrambled negative control) and miRFP703-EB3 (far-red tagged EB3 protein). Red arrows ( B – E ) point to the base of the selected projection. Right: Selected axon and kymograph of miRFP703-EB3. For all kymographs ( B – E ), the vertical arrow represents distance, with the base of the arrow positioned towards the soma and the arrowhead positioned towards the tip of the projection. The horizontal arrows represent time progressing from left to right. C Left: Maximum projection intensity images of axons from cells co-expressing shKif11 (shRNA targeting KIF11) and miRFP703-EB3. Right: Selected axon and kymograph of miRFP703-EB3. D Left: Maximum projection intensity images of dendrites from cells co-expressing NC-GFP (scrambled negative control) and miRFP703-EB3. Right: Selected dendrite and kymograph of miRFP703-EB3. E Left: Maximum projection intensity images of dendrites from cells co-expressing shKif11 (shRNA targeting KIF11) and miRFP703-EB3. Right: Selected dendrite and kymograph of miRFP703-EB3.The percentage of minus-end-out MTs in axons ( F ) and dendrites ( G ) in NC-GFP or shKIF11 neurons. Two-tailed Unpaired t-test. EB3-comet flux in axons ( H ) and dendrites ( I ) in NC-GFP or shKIF11 neurons. One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test. EB3-comet growth rate in axons ( J ) and dendrites ( K ) in NC-GFP or shKIF11 neurons. One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test. EB3-comet distance traveled (MT growth) in axons ( L ) and dendrites ( M ) in NC-GFP or shKIF11 neurons. One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. N The percentage of minus-end-out MTs in primary, secondary, and tertiary dendrites. Mixed-effects model (REML) followed by Tukey’s test. O EB3-comet flux for plus-end-out and minus-end-out EB3 comets in secondary dendrites. One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test. For all graphs ( F–O ), error bars represent ±SEM. P -values are listed above respective comparisons. For F , H , J , L , N = 10, 16 neurons and axons for NC-GFP or shKIF11, respectively. For G , I , K , M , N = 16(40), 15(29) neurons (dendrites) for NC-GFP and shKIF11, respectively. For O and N , NC-GFP N = 16 neurons (4 primary, 14 secondary, and 14 tertiary dendrites), shKIF11 N = 15 neurons (4 primary, 16 secondary, and 9 tertiary dendrites). Source data are provided as a file.
Article Snippet: DIV14-16 Primary hippocampal mouse neurons, plated in 35 mm Mattek No1.5 dishes were simultaneously transfected via combiMag and Lipofectamine with 0.5 μg EB3-miRFP703 (Addgene #79994) or mRuby-Synaptophysin [(pEF Synaptophysin-mRuby was a gift from Edwin Chapman (Addgene plasmid # 188980; http://n2t.net/addgene:188980 ; RRID:Addgene_188980)] or mApple-PSD95 [mApple-PSD95-N-14 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 54941; http://n2t.net/addgene:54941 ; RRID:Addgene_54941)] and either 0.5 μg
Techniques: Expressing, Negative Control, shRNA, Two Tailed Test, Comparison
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Intellectual disability-causing mutations in KIF11 impair microtubule dynamics and dendritic arborization
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70522-z
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Experimental timeline. B Left: Maximum projection intensity image from a neuron co-expressing NC-GFP (scrambled negative control) and mRuby-Synaptophysin. Right: Selected axon and kymograph of mRuby-Synaptophysin. For all kymographs ( B , C , I , J ), the vertical arrow represents distance, with the base of the arrow positioned towards the soma and the arrowhead positioned towards the tip of the projection. The horizontal arrows represent time progressing from left to right. C Left: Maximum projection intensity image from a neuron co-expressing shKif11 (shRNA targeting KIF11) and mRuby-Synaptophysin. Right: Selected axon and kymograph of mRuby-Synaptophysin. D . Percentage of mobile mRuby-Synaptophysin in NC-GFP and shKIF11 primary hippocampal neurons’ axons. Two-tailed Unpaired t-test. In D–G N = 11, 12 neurons/axons for NC-GFP and shKif11, respectively. The flux of mRuby-Synaptophysin ( E ), the velocity of mRuby-Synaptophysin ( F ), and the distance traveled of mRuby-Synaptophysin ( G ) in NC-GFP and shKIF11 primary hippocampal neurons. One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. H . Experimental timeline. I Left: Maximum projection intensity images of dendrites from cells co-expressing NC-GFP and mApple-PSD95. Right: Selected dendrite and kymograph of mApple-PSD95. J Left: Maximum projection intensity images of dendrites from cells co-expressing shKif11 and mApple-PSD95. Right: Selected dendrite and kymograph of mApple-PSD95. K Percentage of mobile mApple-PSD95 in NC-GFP and shKIF11 primary hippocampal neurons. Two-tailed Unpaired t test. mApple-PSD95 flux ( L ), mApple-PSD95 velocity ( M ), and mApple-PSD95 distance traveled ( N ) in NC-GFP and shKIF11 primary hippocampal neurons. One-way ANOVA. Tukey’s multiple comparison test. In K–N N = 13, 9 neurons/dendrites for NC-GFP and shKif11, respectively. For all figures, white arrowheads point to the base of the selected axon/dendrites, red arrowheads highlight trafficking synaptophysin/PDS95. For all graphs ( D–G , K–N ), error bars represent ±SEM. P -values are listed above respective comparisons. Source data are provided as a file.
Article Snippet: DIV14-16 Primary hippocampal mouse neurons, plated in 35 mm Mattek No1.5 dishes were simultaneously transfected via combiMag and Lipofectamine with 0.5 μg EB3-miRFP703 (Addgene #79994) or mRuby-Synaptophysin [(pEF Synaptophysin-mRuby was a gift from Edwin Chapman (Addgene plasmid # 188980; http://n2t.net/addgene:188980 ; RRID:Addgene_188980)] or mApple-PSD95 [mApple-PSD95-N-14 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 54941; http://n2t.net/addgene:54941 ; RRID:Addgene_54941)] and either 0.5 μg
Techniques: Expressing, Negative Control, shRNA, Two Tailed Test, Comparison
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Intellectual disability-causing mutations in KIF11 impair microtubule dynamics and dendritic arborization
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70522-z
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schema of selected Microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema, or intellectual disabilities (MCLID) patient mutations ( Hs: Homo sapiens ) and the corresponding mouse homolog (Mm: Mus Musculus ) (adapted from Schlögel et al. ) on the KIF11 protein. B Experimental timeline. C Confocal projection images of primary hippocampal mouse neurons transfected with control or KIF11 constructs, with the soma in the center of the image. Scale Bar=25 µm. D Soma size quantification of ( C ). N = 20,22,22,19 neurons for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. E Quantification of dendritic morphology changes using Sholl analysis. N = 17,20,20,16 neurons for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F, and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. F Plus-end-out EB3-comet flux in KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 17,17,18,21 dendrites for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. G . Minus-end-out EB3-comets flux in KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 14,16,18,21 dendrites for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. H Percentage of Minus-end-out EB3-comets in KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 17,17,18,22 dendrites for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. I . Length of plus-end-out MT growth for KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 17(248),17(59),18(114),22(184) dendrites (# of comets) for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. J Length of minus-end-out MT growth for KIF11 dendrites compared to NC-GFP. N = 17(70),17(42),18(27),22(45) dendrites (# of comets) for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. K Plus-end-out MT growth-rate based on EB3-comet velocities in KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 17(254),17(56),18(130),22(189) dendrites (# of comets) for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. L Minus-end-out MT growth rate based on EB3-comet velocities in KIF11 dendrites in comparison to NC-GFP. N = 17(59),17(49),18(32),22(41) dendrites (# of comets) for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm , respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. For all graphs ( D–L ), error bars represent ±SEM. P values are listed above respective comparisons. P values are listed above respective comparisons. Source data are provided as a file.
Article Snippet: DIV14-16 Primary hippocampal mouse neurons, plated in 35 mm Mattek No1.5 dishes were simultaneously transfected via combiMag and Lipofectamine with 0.5 μg EB3-miRFP703 (Addgene #79994) or mRuby-Synaptophysin [(pEF Synaptophysin-mRuby was a gift from Edwin Chapman (Addgene plasmid # 188980; http://n2t.net/addgene:188980 ; RRID:Addgene_188980)] or mApple-PSD95 [mApple-PSD95-N-14 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 54941; http://n2t.net/addgene:54941 ; RRID:Addgene_54941)] and either 0.5 μg
Techniques: Transfection, Control, Construct, Comparison
Journal: Nature Communications
Article Title: Intellectual disability-causing mutations in KIF11 impair microtubule dynamics and dendritic arborization
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70522-z
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Timeline of experimental design to record miniature excitatory post-synaptic potential (mEPSCs) in mouse primary hippocampal culture expressing NC-GFP or KIF11 constructs. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was added to ensure mEPSCs and not spontaneous EPSCs were captured. B Two representative traces of mEPSCs for NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm 24–48 h post-transfection. Bar graph of mEPSC amplitude ( C ) and frequency ( D ) in NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm neurons. N = 10,13,12,13 NC-GFP, KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm neurons respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple comparisons test. Cumulative probability graphs showing no change in mEPSC amplitude ( E ), but reduced frequency ( F ) in KIF11-OE, KIF11 Y81F , and KIF11 ΔCterm neurons compared to NC-GFP. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. For graphs ( C , D ), error bars represent ± SEM. P-values are listed above respective comparisons. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Article Snippet: DIV14-16 Primary hippocampal mouse neurons, plated in 35 mm Mattek No1.5 dishes were simultaneously transfected via combiMag and Lipofectamine with 0.5 μg EB3-miRFP703 (Addgene #79994) or mRuby-Synaptophysin [(pEF Synaptophysin-mRuby was a gift from Edwin Chapman (Addgene plasmid # 188980; http://n2t.net/addgene:188980 ; RRID:Addgene_188980)] or mApple-PSD95 [mApple-PSD95-N-14 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 54941; http://n2t.net/addgene:54941 ; RRID:Addgene_54941)] and either 0.5 μg
Techniques: Expressing, Construct, Transfection
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Article Title: Necrotic Cells Alter IRE1α-XBP1 Signaling and Induce Transcriptional Changes in Glioblastoma
doi: 10.3390/ijms27010474
Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of XBP1 knockdown and necrotic cell treatment on XBP1 expression and XBP1-related genes. ( A ) U87-MG cells were transfected with XBP1 siRNA or control GFP siRNA for 48 or 72 h. Knockdown efficiency was assessed by RT-PCR, and relative XBP1 mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *** p < 0.001, as indicated. ( B ) U87-MG cells were transfected with XBP1 siRNA for 72 h and treated with necrotic cells (1:5 ratio) for 24 h. XBP1 expression was assessed by RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, as indicated. ( C ) U87-MG cells were transfected with XBP1 siRNA or control GFP siRNA for 72 h and treated with necrotic cells (1:5 ratio) for 24 h. Expression of XBP1-related genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, as indicated.
Article Snippet: Cells were transfected with either human XBP1 siRNA (
Techniques: Knockdown, Expressing, Transfection, Control, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR